Pakistan’s complex web of terror networks

Pakistan’s complex web of terror networks

Static GK   /   Pakistan’s complex web of terror networks

Change Language English Hindi

The Hindu: Published on 8th May 2025:

 

Why in News? 

The issue has resurfaced globally following:

April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack (26 civilians killed), forensically linked to Pakistan-trained LeT operatives.

Increasing international scrutiny over Pakistan’s failure to dismantle its terror ecosystem despite repeated FATF warnings.

Recent UN Security Council questioning Pakistan’s nuclear and terror-related activities.

Ongoing resurgence of cross-border terrorism backed by Pakistan, particularly in Kashmir.

 

Historical Background

1979 Soviet-Afghan War: Turning point when Pakistan’s ISI, backed by CIA, began cultivating jihadi groups.

Creation of LeT (1990s) and JeM (2000) as state-backed proxies against India.

Pakistan’s 'strategic depth' doctrine included using terror groups as asymmetric tools in Kashmir and Afghanistan.

FATF grey-listings since 2008 show long-standing global concerns over Pakistan's terror finance systems.

 

Key Terror Groups and Structure

a. Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT)

Head: Hafiz Saeed (UN-designated terrorist).

Infrastructure: 200-acre HQ near Lahore; 300+ madrassas; 16+ training camps.

Major Attacks: 2008 Mumbai attacks, 2006 Mumbai train blasts.

Funding: ISI (~$25–50 million), Gulf donors, diaspora, and real estate.

Transnational Reach: Active in 21 countries, esp. Nepal and Bangladesh.

 

b. Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM)

Head: Masood Azhar (released after IC-814 hijack).

Ideology: Deobandi radicalism + suicide martyrdom.

Infrastructure: HQ in Bahawalpur, 11 camps incl. Balakot.

Major Attacks: 2001 Parliament, 2019 Pulwama.

Funding: Al-Rehmat Trust, ISI, local extortion, real estate ($30M+).

 

c. Haqqani Network

Functions as semi-autonomous ISI wing in Afghanistan.

Leader Sirajuddin Haqqani is Afghan Interior Minister, despite US bounty.

 

d. Islamic State – Khorasan (ISIS-K)

Splinter of TTP; operates in tribal belt; tacit support from Pak agencies.

 

e. Harakat-ul-Mujahideen (HuM)

Acts as recruitment pipeline to LeT and JeM from religious seminaries.

 

Role of Pakistani State:

ISI’s 'S-Wing' handles strategy and funding.

Retired military officials provide operational support and intelligence.

Material assistance includes safe havens, weapons, training, and passports.

 

Open admissions:

Pervez Musharraf: “We trained them for Kashmir.”

Nawaz Sharif: “We used them as tools.”

Bilawal Bhutto: “We did the West’s dirty work.”

 

Financial Ecosystem:

Religious charities/fronts: 40+ organisations raise $150–200 million annually.

State budgets: $100–125 million in classified military funding.

Money laundering & Hawala: Major hubs in Dubai, Karachi, and Peshawar.

Narcotics trade: ~$75 million annually.

Cryptocurrency (2023): $15+ million routed.

 

Radicalisation Infrastructure:

30,000+ madrassas; 10–15% linked to extremists.

Radical content in textbooks and religious discourse.

Recruitment focus: Poor, uneducated youth; high youth vulnerability.

Use of online media, apps, publications for jihadi indoctrination.

 

Evolution & Trends:

1990s: Kashmir-centric proxy war (LeT, HuM).

2000s: Rise of suicide terrorism (JeM).

Post-9/11: Greater sophistication & plausible deniability.

2021 Taliban takeover: Boost to training and infiltration.

2023-24: Joint ops between LeT, JeM, and Taliban-affiliates increase.

 

Global and Regional Implications:

India bears the brunt of terror attacks and proxy warfare.

Regional instability in South Asia — threat to Afghanistan, Bangladesh.

Undermines global counter-terrorism framework and rules-based order.

Potential risk of nuclear-terrorism nexus.

Destabilises UN, FATF, and international norms.

 

International Response:

FATF grey-listed Pakistan multiple times (2008–2022).

U.S., EU, India and other global powers demand verifiable dismantling.

UNSC, Interpol actively monitor Pakistan-based terror figures.

Recent sanctions, travel bans, asset freezes on key operatives.

Global frustration over Pakistan’s "good vs bad terrorist" doctrine.

 

Conclusion and Way Forward:

Pakistan’s terror infrastructure is not accidental — it is state-supported and institutionalised. This machinery has:

Survived for decades,

Evolved tactically,

Been financially robust, and

Continues to radicalise and mobilise at scale.

 

The world must:

Apply continuous diplomatic, economic, and military pressure,

Demand total dismantling of all terror ecosystems (not cosmetic rebranding),

Ensure accountability of Pakistani agencies, and

Bolster regional and global counter-terrorism cooperation.

Other Post's
  • Carbon dating of a 'Shivalinga' allowed inside Gyanvapi mosque

    Read More
  • The youngest learners

    Read More
  • Increasing India's Election Commission's Transparency

    Read More
  • Pollution Certificates to Be Made Mandatory for Refuelling Vehicles

    Read More
  • Booker Prize Winners 2024

    Read More