The Hindu: Published on 18th May 2025:
Why in News?
India has restricted Bangladeshi exports of ready-made garments (RMGs) through land ports, allowing their entry only through Kolkata and Mumbai ports.
This is a retaliatory measure after Bangladesh imposed similar restrictions on Indian yarn and rice exports via land.
Background:
Trade relations between India and Bangladesh are generally cooperative but have seen occasional friction.
On April 13, 2025, Bangladesh imposed a ban on Indian yarn exports via land ports, allowing them only through sea routes.
On April 15, Bangladesh also blocked Indian rice exports via important land ICPs (Integrated Check Posts) like Hili and Benapole.
India’s move is seen as a reciprocal action to protect local manufacturers and ensure trade parity.
Key Points of the Action:
Ready-made garments (RMGs) from Bangladesh can now enter India only via Kolkata and Nhava Sheva (Mumbai) ports.
Land ports in Northeast (Tripura, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram) are now closed to Bangladeshi RMG exports.
Other restricted items include:
Plastics
Wooden furniture
Juices & carbonated drinks
Fruit drinks
Bakery & confectionery
Cotton yarn & dyes
The list will be reviewed periodically.
The objective is to encourage local manufacturing in the Northeast and respond diplomatically to Bangladesh's actions.
Legal & Trade Basis:
India has acted via a notification from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT).
Trade measures are WTO-compliant as long as non-discriminatory and proportionate.
India views this step as a reciprocal, defensive measure rather than aggressive trade policy.
International/Strategic Angle:
Bangladesh’s interim government under Muhammad Yunus recently courted China, describing Northeast India as “landlocked” and inviting China to access the region via Bangladesh.
This geo-strategic messaging by Bangladesh is seen by India as diplomatically provocative.
India’s action may be seen as a signal to Dhaka that geo-economic decisions have consequences.
Economic Impact:
For Bangladesh:
Potential loss of market access to Indian Northeast—a major buyer of Bangladeshi garments.
Increased logistics costs as goods now need to go through sea ports.
Export sector may suffer short-term shocks.
For India:
Opportunity to boost Northeast’s local industries, including textile, food processing, and furniture sectors
Possible rise in prices of some items if local supply chains do not ramp up quickly.
Political Significance:
Shows a firm and strategic shift in India’s trade diplomacy.
Reflects increasing emphasis on "Act East" policy and economic nationalism.
Also signals India’s assertiveness in bilateral trade fairness, especially in an election-sensitive time.
Possible Future Developments:
Dialogue between India and Bangladesh may be initiated to resolve trade tensions.
Bangladesh may reverse or revise its restrictions on Indian exports.
India may either escalate or relax restrictions depending on Bangladesh’s response.
Increased Chinese economic activity in Bangladesh could complicate regional trade dynamics further.
Conclusion:
India's restrictions on land-based exports from Bangladesh are a calibrated, reciprocal trade response aimed at: